Harris for President, I guess.

So, election 2024.

When I was younger, I took absolute delight in understanding and picking apart politics. Process was this fascinating puzzle. So was figuring out how coalitions came together, how stuff winded through committees, how you could get surprising results, like Old Bush and Tip O’Neil coming together to put the clean air act into place. I wrote a lot about politics, both in blogs and in social media. I wanted to take this messy and complex thing and make it understandable. I still kind of want to do this sometimes.

But, that has gotten harder and harder and harder as the years have piled up. The first big hit was seeing how the Gingrich Congress unfolded. I was too young in 1994 to really understand what was happening, but Gingrich took the above approach and firmly rejected it in favor of a new, scorched-earth style of politics. Republicans of this period, quite overtly, stopped talking about careful policy proposals and opted for streamlined and centralized talking points. Right wing media arose at the same time, in the form of Rush Limbaugh and Fox News to reinforce this sort of newspeak, along with this notion of being at total war, even with the explicitly centrist Bill Clinton.

Even still, there was some joy in communicating the differences amongst even the Republicans. I’d hold primary watch parties. I’d liveblog states of the union. I’d cheerily talk about all of the stuff to kind of indicate why it *mattered* and how you could push the system in places to get outcomes. This got worse and worse. I endured the September 11th game of everyone who wasn’t explicitly with the Iraq war being accused of treason, and getting that much for even daring to suggest “perhaps going to Afghanistan without a plan is unwise.” Still, there were important and interesting differences inside both of the parties through the GWB era. And I could follow it, and have chats with my friends about all of it. It seemed like a critical mass of people were getting upset with how things were, and that the dam was breaking with the 2008 financial crisis. Obama won…

And around this time, three things happened that changed my relationship to politics. First, there was a hyper-acrimonious primary that was nearly completely online for the most part. It was very interesting watching friends groups destroy themselves over what was, to me, a very small policy difference between Clinton and Obama. Second, the republicans, out of racism and what seemed to be a realigning election, went absolutely apocalyptic in their resistance to Obama. The “everything gets filibustered” behavior became even larger, which lead to the third thing, which was Obamacare’s initial passage being pretty much the last hurrah of any ordinary process for a bill passing Congress. Even this process involved a bunch of nasty private negotiating, most notably Ben Nelson aggressively holding out unilaterally on the bill. This last feature would become a key feature of pretty much all future congressional wranglings, with committees being replaced by ping-pong legislation between the two chambers and the President, with committees being de-emphasized more and more, and the real understanding coming down to Kremlinology of the Speaker, the President, and the Senate Majoritiy leader, along with maybe some party holdouts. In such an environment, there is nothing really to follow, and even organizing is close to meaningless, because the decision comes down to “I hope this asshole from West Virginia is merciful”.

And so, Donald J. Trump got elected. There’s not much useful to add on to the pile of Donald Trump discourse, but all I really will say is that the purpose of Donald Trump is not to inspire, not to solve problems, not to do anything but to be mean. The media has tried to call him out for his namecalling and meanspiritedness, but that’s the point of him. His supporters are angry, and nihlistic, and don’t want solutions, they want someone to blame, and he is blaming them in blunt, harsh, and direct terms. Since the Republican party has become the Trump party, to the extent that for most of that period, the Republicans have had various blocks in the place in the system, there is no talk of anything but “surviving this”. Who, at the moment, the exact white whale that Captain Ahab is stabbing at from time to time may vary, but he is there to stab, and no amount of legalistic or philosophical discussion can get through to him or his supporters. And it’s turned my analytical brain off.

And so, we’re at election 2024, in late October. Most election forecasting shows a 50/50 shot for the election. We have, in Kamala Harris, someone who is desperately avoiding so many issues, most notably Gaza, but in the face of the Republican closing message on this election being “demonizing trans people”, she can only muster “I will follow the law” on a question of fundamental rights. No comment on Israel expanding its war to Lebanon, or on them firing on UN peacekeepers. She threw the people dying on the border under the bus in her first week of having the nomination, resetting the debate about immigration to “catastrophically deporting 20 million people” versus “draconian compromise border bill”. Even “codify Roe into law” does not do enough to protect people needing abortion care or for the numerous other people whose bodily autonomy is desperately threatened. Nor does it repeal the fucking Hyde amendment. Also, of course, we did not have a real primary to get here, which eliminated the opportunity to have a public internal debate about all of this. And, also, of course, the DNC was so so so so jingoistic, even for a political convention.

But the thing is, with this years swift boat attempt being trans people, with the catastrophic hate that Trump brings to the table (and I honestly think focusing on the policy in project 2025 misses the point — I doubt Trump will systematically enact an agenda so much as “grab power and scream at opponents, and act vindictively), it’s pretty clear to me that the Democrats will be directly blaming trans rights for an election loss, and that Trump will be out to punish whoever he can to feed his ugly little hate machine.

I will be voting for Harris and Walz next week, but any joy in doing so will be long gone. Whoever wins, I will be investing in my local community and disengaging from national elections. I will be annoying to my state and federal legislators, and I will never ever ever shut up about trans rights. I don’t believe in voting as anything other than pushing a button and hoping for a response, and do not have the moral sense of “endorsement” that a lot of people have, and I vote with that in mind. Instead, I simply hope for a next four years where continuing to fight will be easier and more survivable. Anyone else’s path can be what it will be. I can absolutely understand not being willing to do the same, particularly from a state where the electoral college has rendered your individual vote irrelevant. That said, this is what I am doing. If you are a Trump voter at this point, and wish to maintain ties to me, well, we will have to look each other in the face and really talk about what this man’s legacy has done to me and mine in the past eight years, and you will have to make a choice.

May all the fucking guns in the world be melted to scrap iron and we actually get past fighting about bullshit and actually start helping each other.

Published by zoe_michelle

Trans woman living in the PNW. Aerialist. Writer, sometimes. Computer programming shit, more often than she would like. Academic apostate.

8 thoughts on “Harris for President, I guess.

  1. I have always appreciated your analysis – and this is no exception. There is no hope left, when participating in such an obviously corrupted and damaged system. I will never stop voting for my survival, so for the better option, safer for more people; but it is definitely “buying time” rather than setting out on some redemptive path. But fingers crossed we collectively buy people some time.

    Like

    1. Thank you. And that’s about right. I do hold up some hope that maybe a president Harris could surprise. But I’m ultimately at the conclusion that no politician will do what you don’t force them to do, which means, either way, build those connections, talk about the stuff, organize more.

      The end goal is a social movement that is stronger than the political parties.

      Like

  2. A good read and good analysis.

    I don’t THINK win or lose that the Dems will blame trans rights or walk away from supporting them. But I certainly understand I’m saying that from a place of not being as directly affected if I’m wrong.

    I think Israel-Palestine will be seen as the wedge that turned ally against ally and cost the election in a loss or made it a more nail biter of a win if a win. Whether that results in real dialogue, a sensible and defensible policy, and some kind of healing or whether politicians bank on the situation somehow being less dire and electric in 2 or 4 years and just quietly wait it out, I sincerely don’t know. I suspect the latter, unless things get even more dire (which sadly seems likely) and force the issue. But depending on the state, Trump is courting Arab and Palestinian allied voters for the Biden-Harris policy harming Palestinians or blasting Harris for being Anti-Semitic and asserting he’ll be so much better for unconditional support of Israel. Dem support is bleeding from the folks refusing to support anyone who supports the genocide, and from folks who think we should be doing more to support an ally who’s been attacked. People who usually reliably vote Dem are in the streets marching on both sides of this one.

    I agree, MAGA plans to continue to stoke the trans-hate. I know the Dem coalition isn’t AS united around trans-rights as, say, abortion access, and I can understand apprehension about the solidness of that support if it continues to be hot in the culture wars. But in today’s polarized binary world, I think MAGA targeting transfolks so explicitly for hatred tends to solidify the feeling to defend them. And I think for the Dems that Israel-Palestine is the elephant in the room, and will be using up much of the oxygen in the room in the post-election self-examinations.

    Like

  3. I do hope that we can get back to actually having discussions on policy being meaningful and enact some beneficial change. I agree, the “insane nihilist hatemongers” vs “keep the lights on and things running, live to fight another day (with some accompanying baggage, good and bad, but set that aside for now)” current split isn’t good, though it’s hard to see how we get out of that when somehow those lines leave us scarily close to 50/50 support. I think part of it is the process Gingrich especially started means that there’s not much benefit to bipartisan deals that result in an actual change – folks don’t run on positive legislative accomplishments, they run on stopping the other team. So we have deadlock. And so then, campaign promises become largely empty promises since 4 years later few got done. So there’s backlash. And so the pendulum swings to see if the other team can do something (since their campaign promises say they will). Made worse by the fact that what changes CAN get done are often things where the price comes due during the next administration. And the fact that nothing gets done fuels the idea that government is broken and we’re better off dismantling it than trying to make it better. It’s a bad cycle. I have hope we can break it, though I don’t really know how.

    Like

  4. I do think, if Harris wins, this is likely the highwater mark of political transphobia at least in the short term.

    If Trump wins, however, I don’t get how it doesn’t get spun as “Trump’s closing argument about trans rights swung blue-collar voters in Pennsylvania to eke out a win”, and I don’t see **that** as not giving the Democrats a reason to drop us, just like Harris has already dropped the immigrants at the border. Just like how the Willy Horton thing produced tough-on-crime Bill Clinton, and the Bush Era made the Democrats super jingoistic. I hope I’m wrong, but I believe that my apprehension is merited.

    Like

    1. Damnit. I’m sure this loss will be analyzed pretty heavily, but…

      At least so far, it seems like folks are focused on:

      1) It’s the economy. Americans think Republicans are better on this issue in general and Trump in particular, and the past four years have been rough with Biden/Harris getting much of the blame. (Reality usually being very different, but seems to be a hard-to-shake belief.)
      2) America’s still not ready for a woman president (at least who’s also a Dem)
      3) Too many Dems sat this out (probably some more deconstruction of this)

      For #1, I still feel like “were you better four years ago” had such an obvious retort of “four years ago we were still worried about getting toilet paper and unable to properly deal with a crisis because our coffers had been drained in handouts to the rich. It’s been 4 years of tough recovery from the past failed Trump presidency.”

      Losing Penn is certainly big, and I don’t know how much playing up transphobia played a role there, not being in their media market. I haven’t especially been hearing it mentioned though, mostly about those three issues – partly because the loss was much more nationwide than PA. Not quite sure how much divisions over Gaza played a role in #3.

      I still think/hope the loss will rally support for the groups likely to be targeted going forward, not cause backlash and abandonment of them. Sadly, it will likely be in part due to the theoretical harm being made so much more real and visible. Time for communities to come together and protect each other.

      But still, fuck.

      Like

Leave a comment